The simple answer is YES! Of course, you won’t get many people to admit it, in fact, liberals are going out of their way to deny or cover it up whenever it is found. It isn’t being discovered in large numbers, but that could just be because there is no real way to know how bad it really is.
Fraud Discovered Through Crime
One of the ways that voter fraud is discovered is when people commit crimes, recently it was thought that the Cascade Mall shooter in Washington might have illegally voted. We know he voted in one local election, one federal election and the recent presidential primary. But people were unsure if he had registered legally.
It turns out that even though he was born in Turkey, he was a permanent resident and could after a certain amount of time, apply for U.S. citizenship. He did do this, so he did legally vote.
But in looking at his case, it became disturbingly clear that there are zero safeguards in the voter registration process. Potential voters must attest to their citizenship when registering online or registering to vote at the Department of Licensing Office, but Washington state does not require any proof of citizenship.
So the entire election process operates on an honor system. We are hoping that one of the most cherished actions you can take as an American citizen is not being stolen by people who may have already broken the law just to be here!
Secretary of State Kim Wyman said, “We don’t have a provision in state law that allows either county elections officials or the Secretary of State’s office to verify someone’s citizenship. So, we are in this place where we want to make sure we are maintaining people’s confidence in the elections and the integrity of the process, but also that we’re giving this individual, like we would any voter, his due process. We are moving forward, and that investigation is really coming out of the investigation from the shootings.”
Wyman says while it’s impossible to determine an exact number, but she does not believe this case points to a larger issue. So we have that assurance, our rights are only being stolen by a small portion of illegal aliens…maybe, we aren’t really sure.
The penalty for voting as a non U.S. citizen can result in up to five years of prison time or a $10,000 fine, according to Secretary of State’s Office.
“The penalties are very serious. That’s why we want to make sure we are very measured, and this is why we want to make sure we are very calm and purposeful in how we move forward,” Wyman said. “The stakes are very high on both sides. You want to keep the confidence level high, but you also want to protect the voting rights of everyone.”
“Our hands are kind of tied, but make no mistake, we want to make sure that everybody has confidence that people casting ballots are eligible. This is certainly going to be a topic at next legislation.”
They want to be sure that people casting ballots are eligible (U.S. citizens), but yet they require zero proof that they are? Once again, these officials expect criminals to be honest, they just don’t get it.
Things to Do in Denver When You’re Dead
Voting is apparently high on that list. A CBS4 investigation found multiple cases of dead men and women voting in Colorado for months and in some cases years after their deaths. This finding calls into question the safeguards designed to prevent such occurrences from happening.
Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams said, “We do believe there were several instances of potential vote fraud that occurred,” after reviewing the investigations findings. “It shows there is the potential for fraud.”
“It’s not a perfect system. There are some gaps,” acknowledged Williams.
One of the most glaring cases was that of Sara Sosa in Colorado Springs. She died on Oct. 14, 2009. However, the investigation uncovered voting records that showed ballots cast for Sosa in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Her husband, Miguel, died on Sept. 26, 2008. But records were found showing that a vote was cast in his name the next year, 2009.
El Paso County Clerk and Recorder Chuck Broerman said, “That’s illegal,” and called the investigations findings “very serious.”
“I was shocked and surprised at this,” said Broerman. “This cannot happen. We cannot have this here or anyplace in our country. Our democracy depends on it. People have spilled their blood for the values and underpinnings and beliefs of this country.”
Broerman said after their deaths, the Sosa’s remained on active voter rolls and mail ballots were still sent to their home because they did not meet the criteria to have their names deleted from eligible voter rolls.
“Somebody was able to cast a vote that was not theirs to cast,” concluded Broerman.
John Grosso of Denver was a father, grandfather and World War II veteran who died Dec. 13, 2004. Records show though that Grosso then voted in a 2006 primary election, two years after his death.
“I think that’s a disgrace,” said his son, John. “The man is dead. He can’t vote. Somebody is cheating.”
Administrators with the Secretary of State’s Office believe Grosso’s vote may have been an error by an election judge. But the bigger question is why Grosso and dozens of others were still listed as active voter’s months and sometimes years after their deaths?
State voting officials say they can only delete names from voting rolls if a number of precise criteria from death databases are met: names must be spelled precisely right, dates of birth must be correct and addresses must match. They say in many cases minor errors on the voter rolls or death databases leave election officials no choice but to leave dead people registered, leading to potential fraud and mistaken votes.
Out of the approximately 2 million votes cast in Colorado’s last election, 8,000 ballots were not counted when signatures did not match. The importance of finding and weeding out fraudulent votes is underlined by the 2002 election in Colorado’s 7th Congressional district. That race was decided by 121 votes out of more than 175,000 that were cast.
In Ohio in 2010, a tax measure passed by just two votes. Only 2 votes, but yet we are told that no voter fraud exists in at all or in numbers large enough to matter.
Following the investigation, the Colorado Secretary of State’s office reviewed the findings of the TV stations investigation and confirmed at least 78 dead voters showed as eligible to vote. Lynn Bartels, a spokesperson for the Secretary of State’s office, said that county clerks were notified and told to immediately remove those 78 names from the voter rolls. Bartels said “It’s not clear why” those dead citizens were still being listed as eligible voters.
Colorado Secretary of State Wayne Williams said, “It’s not a perfect system. It is impossible to vote from the grave legally.”
The Dead Rise in Virginia
The FBI and local police are investigating how at least 19 dead Virginians were recently re-registered to vote in this critical swing state.
Rockingham County Commonwealth’s Attorney Marsha Garst said that one case came to their attention after the relatives of a deceased man received a note congratulating him for registering.
“His family members were very distraught,” said Garst, who confirmed the existence of the FBI and police investigation but said that she could not provide details because of the ongoing case.
A county clerk recognized the name of Richard Allen Claybrook Sr., who had died in 2014 at age 87, because his son is a well-known local judge. She happened to recall that the judge’s father had died.
Retired Harrisonburg General District Court Judge Richard Allen Claybrook Jr. said, “He was a retired Fairfax County elementary school principal and had fought in World War II. So our family is very disgusted that they would pick his name, because he was such a law-abiding citizen devoted to public service.”
Andrew Spieles, a student at James Madison University, was working for a group called HarrisonburgVOTES that was trying to increase the number of registered voters in Harrisonburg to 25,000, Harrisonburg currently has about 17,000 registered voters and an expected 18,000 that are eligible to vote. Apparently Spieles has confessed to re-registering 19 deceased Virginians to vote in the 2016 election cycle.
Spieles just happens to be Democrat who, accorded to a recently deleted Facebook post, apparently recently ran for Caucus Chair of the Virginia Young Democrats. Expect him to run for congress in a few years.
HarrisonburgVOTES is a “non-partisan” voter registration organization in Harrisonburg, VA and the surrounding areas and was founded by Joseph Fitzgerald who is currently the Chairman of the Sixth Congressional District Democratic Committee in Virginia and the former Mayor of Harrisonburg.
Fitzgerald denied any knowledge of Spieles actions and said he has been fired. No word on any legal or criminal action being taken and doubtful the Justice Department will care since everyone involved is a Democrat.
Republicans in the state House of Delegates, who in recent years have supported tighter voter ID laws, held a conference call with reporters to call attention to the investigation.
House Speaker William J. Howell (R-Stafford) said, “Oftentimes we hear our Democratic colleagues suggest that voter fraud doesn’t exist in Virginia, or it’s a myth. This is proof that voter fraud not only exists but is ongoing and is a threat to the integrity of our elections.”
House Minority Leader David J. Toscano (D-Charlottesville) said the case was not proof of voter fraud because no one had actually managed to cast a vote in the names of the dead.
“First of all, there was no voter fraud, they caught him,” Toscano said. “Nobody cast a vote. There’s still no evidence of that going on in the state. But there is evidence every time you turn around that the Republicans are trying to make it more difficult for citizens to vote in elections.”
Remember, this was all uncovered only because a county clerk recognized one single name in a fairly small town, there are no checks and balances in place to stop this from happening. But the Democrats like Toscano will scream voter disenfranchisement if you even suggest that we make sure voters are real live human beings and eligible to vote.
Tens of Thousands of Votes
The Christian Times has reported that election officials in Franklin County, Ohio are quite concerned over what a maintenance worker found in an old downtown Columbus warehouse earlier this week.
According to their sources, a Columbus-area electrical worker was doing a routine check of his companies wiring and electrical systems when he found approximately one dozen black, sealed ballot boxes filled with tens of thousands of Franklin County ballots.
Early voting does not begin in Ohio until October 12, so no votes could have been officially cast in the state. Which makes what is inside these boxes, even more disturbing, tens of thousands of votes for Hillary Clinton and every democrat running in the election.
This Ohio story has yet to be verified, it has however been repeated almost word for word in several online publications, so take this one with a grain of salt, but this could explain why Hillary is not campaigning or spending big money on ads in Ohio. They already had the election in the boxes, if this information is true.
What we can be sure of however, is that no matter how often the NY Times and others say there is no voter fraud, it is happening. On what scale is the unknown, but without proper checks in place, we can never know. And I think that is by design.
The countries to our North and South both require ID to vote, as do most developed countries, even India, a country with 1.2 billion people has managed to provide everyone with a voter ID, but for some reason, Democrats fight this idea every chance they get. Sure makes you think that voter fraud is more widespread than we are being told.
While the mainstream media may not be making a big deal out of the leaks, or in some cases even covering it up because of their involvement, these emails and audio files have shown us just how corrupt our election process actually is.
Who Is to Blame?
As much as the Democrats are trying to spin this story and place the blame on the Russians and connect it to Donald Trump, the simple fact remains that if these abuses did not occur, there would be nothing to leak. The Russians are a strange scapegoat however since it would be illogical for the Russians to want to ruin Hillary’s presidential run after dealings with Uranium One.
Uranium One is a uranium mining company owned by the Russian government with headquarters in Toronto and it has operations in Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, South Africa and the United States. It is a Canadian corporation even though it is 100% Russian owned. Rosatom, the Russian State-owned Atomic Energy Corporation, through its subsidiary ARMZ Uranium Holding, purchased the balance of a 100% stake in the Uranium One in January 2013.
Approval of the transfer of 1/5th of all of the American uranium resources to Russian controlled Uranium One occurred during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as United States Secretary of State. As is usual with most of her dealings with foreign governments, there were a number of donations to the Clinton Foundation by the principals of Uranium One. During the same period there was a speaking engagement in Russia by former president Bill Clinton for which he was paid a lofty $500,000.
No matter how shady the above looks, only the Russians would be able to make it illegal by saying that the donations and speaking fees were indeed a payment to Hillary Clinton for approving the deal. Baring that direct connection, it only looks like the usual pay for play deals that Hillary used to make them so wealthy and while that looks bad, it isn’t illegal to only look crooked, you have to be caught as well.
No, the blame falls on the shoulders of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the people that worked for her, the entire Democratic National Convention (DNC) and quite possibly, Hillary Roddam Clinton who many believe to be the mastermind behind all of the corruption linked to the DNC. Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down following the convention because of the scandal, but before that could even happen, Hillary announced that Debbie Wasserman Schultz would immediately be hired as Hillary’s National Campaign Chair.
How Debbie Wasserman Schultz Was Allowed to Corrupt the System
First off, you need to ask yourself, would the person who just stepped down from the DNC in disgrace for unethical dealings in the primaries be your first choice to run your campaign? Only Hillary could pull something like that off and have the media fall silent, but as the #DNCLeaks tell us, the media was in collusion with her campaign the entire time anyways.
As I have now learned to do for every article I write, I typed a few keywords into the Genesis Total Research Project (GTRP) as it doesn’t just search for the words, but shows connections and relationships that you wouldn’t see without a visual data analysis like GTRP. Something popped out at me in the screen below, and even though it is commonly available information, the relationship hasn’t been so clear as it is in that screen.
This got me thinking, we all know that Hillary Clinton has wanted to be president for some time and her loss to Barack Obama in 2008 was hard on her and her campaign co-chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Hillary wanted to ensure she gets nominated in 2016 and what better way than have her campaign co-chair as the head of the DNC. Pretty hard to lose when your pal Debbie Wasserman Schultz is running the whole party, right?
To make this happen though, Hillary would need to convince the then current head of the DNC to not only step down from the position, but also recommend Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DWS) to lead the party. You would need to make some pretty big promises for someone to go along with that plan and step down from the DNC and recommend DWS to succeed them.
But, in 2011, the head of the DNC did exactly that, he stepped down and recommended that Debbie Wasserman Schultz succeed him as the head of the party. That person was Tim Kaine and in 2016 would be named as Hillary Roddam Clinton’s Vice President running mate.
All that sounds more like an episode of Mission Impossible than the run up to a presidential election, but then again, this election is unlike any before it. What previous election saw the DNC sending out interns and paid protestors to attack the supporters of the other party’s presumptive nominee? When was the last time that both political parties attacked candidates running under the same party?
As is usually the case with anything Hillary Clinton is accused of, there is no actual evidence, it has been lost, deleted or the people who could actually testify against her end up dead through suicide, bizarre accidents or some strange type of “natural causes”.
All the direct evidence so far in the #DNCLeaks just points at Debbie Wasserman Schultz who has served Hillary Clinton well and was immediately rewarded for such service. There is a greater chance that Chelsea Clinton would end up dead from one of the mysterious circumstances that have plagued so many others in the Clinton circle than Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
who has proven her loyalty time and again.
New evidence could surface that links Hillary to all this corruption, but for now we are just told it is all the Russians fault and that there is nothing to see here.
What Is Actually in the #DNCLeaks?
Too much to fit into a single article, but we can bullet point some of the main issues and urge you to go to WikiLeaks and find out for yourself.
From WikiLeaks: Today, Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks releases 19,252 emails and 8,034 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee — part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC: Communications Director Luis Miranda (10770 emails), National Finance Director Jordon Kaplan (3797 emails), Finance Chief of Staff Scott Comer (3095 emails), Finance Director of Data & Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish (1472 emails), Finance Director Allen Zachary (1611 emails), Senior Advisor Andrew Wright (938 emails) and Northern California Finance Director Robert (Erik) Stowe (751 emails). The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
As you can see, this first batch of emails was from the Finance side of the DNC and still shows the corruption and racism of the Democrats, imagine what emails from the
Communications, Operations, Office of the Chair or Voter Expansion Departments would show.
Here’s a quick list of some of the items:
DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign
DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment
Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters
DNC member killed horses for insurance money, but they still accept his donations
Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC
Bringing up Sanders religion to scare the southern voters
Politico writer sending his stories to the DNC before he sends them to his editor
DNC feeding CNN the questions they want to be asked in interviews
Creating a fake job ad for a Trump business to paint him as a sexist
Draft linking news articles about trump to use as negative press
Buzz Feed and DNC connection
Press talking points, states Hillary is their candidate, dated May 5, 2016 (Before Bernie dropped out)
DNC trying to get away with violating the Hatch Act
DNC asking if Jake Tapper can do hit pieces for them
Possible money laundering by moving money back and forth to bypass legal limits
DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in MSNBC President Phil Griffin’s office
DNC making fun of black woman’s name
DNC using “taco bowl engagement” when referring to Latino voters
And this is just from the Finance Department, no wonder they are trying to make this sound like Cold War espionage, just imagine what bombshells other departments emails could have in them!
What Does It All Mean?
There is really nothing earth shattering in these emails for most Republicans, we have known that the Democrats were corrupt, we just didn’t have proof to show their constituents, and now that we have it, they won’t believe it or simply don’t care.
The divide between the two political parties is actually so great that the Democrats don’t even care that their party was subverting the primary process (well except Bernie voters) and could be shown video of Hillary biting the heads off small children and they would still vote for her. It is incredible.
Hopefully Trump will win the White House and live up to his word to “Make America Great Again”, because if the corruption of the Hillary Clinton campaign wins the presidency, we could all be in very dire circumstances.
Today we saw a link on www.drudgereport.com:
In this article it was stated that Trump posted Jorge Ramos’ cell phone number on the Internet.
We made a short video to look a little deeper into this issue to try and understand why Trump would have done that….