It is certainly nothing new to have politicians lie about things, just about everything actually, but Democrats have added a new tool to their arsenal, making the truth look absurd.
A Change in Tone
It used to be, if a campaign was caught doing something illegal, immoral or just plain shady, they would lie about their involvement, deny any knowledge of the issue or just ignore it until the news cycle forgot about it.
That is no longer the plan for the Democrats, instead they have taken to broadcasting it loud and clear while at the same time branding it as a conspiracy theory. This way, there is no danger of too many people supporting the idea, because who wants to be lumped in with the tin foil hat wearing lunatics, it is actually a brilliant strategy.
Rather than fight the allegations being held against Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Convention, they simply say it is nothing more than fantasy from those crazy crackpots that think the moon landing was faked. This of course, along with the media collusion that was proven in the DNCLeaks, instantly kills the traction of any story that makes Hillary look bad.
While many expected this election to be extra dirty, this new tactic is actually keeping it looking clean, even if the tactics used are actually twice as dirty. Not that Hillary isn’t still spending millions on negative attack ads against Donald Trump, because she is, but by not defending as many of the hits against her and simply saying that it is the crazy people, her campaign is getting away with not having to debate these facts in the media.
How Long Can They Keep It Up?
While it has been working well so far, especially with Hillary Clinton’s health issues where her camp may have even been the ones to release the “body double” photos so they could instantly kill that story by once again saying it was the “deplorables”, those nutjobs that follow Trump, making up more crazy stories, the tactics time may be running out.
Hillary can only go to that well so many times during the debates, if her every response is “you people are crazy”, she will be the one that looks to be unstable, not Trump or his supporters. If she ever actually has a press conference that allows real journalists to ask her pointed questions rather than pre-approved ones, that tactic will fail there as well.
Hillary and the DNC have convinced more people that the Russians are trying to corrupt the American political process by hacking the DNC’s emails, than are actually looking at the corruption those emails uncovered. The FBI is now investigating Russian hackers and not the DNC even though the hacked emails proved the corruption and collusion exists.
“The DNC is the victim of a crime, an illegal cyber-attack by Russian state-sponsored agents who seek to harm the Democratic Party and progressive groups in an effort to influence the presidential election,” Interim DNC Chair Donna Brazile said in a statement.
“There’s one person who stands to benefit from these criminal acts, and that’s Donald Trump,” she added. “Not only has Trump embraced Putin, he publicly encouraged further Russian espionage to help his campaign.”
This was put out by the DNC to attempt to discredit the information exposed by Guccifer 2.0, even suggesting that some of the documents may have been forged. Guccifer 2.0 has publicly stated that he/she has no connection to the Russians.
It isn’t surprising that the DNC would try and create fear surrounding cyber security and hurl blame at Donald Trump and the Russian government, but is that enough to distract from the content of these emails. There is a letter that directly addressed how to handle donors who submitted “pay-to-play letters” to ensure their donations were put into the “operating amount.”
Also in the latest leak was a list of over 100,000 donations dating all the way back to 2008, including some high-profile donors who received international ambassadorships from President Barack Obama in return for their pledges to both the DNC and Obama’s Organizing for Action nonprofit.
Matthew Barzun donated more than $3.5 million to Obama and the DNC. In return, he served as U.S. Ambassador to Sweden from 2009 to 2011, worked as President Obama’s National Finance Chair during his 2012 reelection campaign, and is currently U.S. Ambassador to the United Kingdom.
Julius Genachowski, was appointed the chair of the FCC for his generous donation of just under $3.5 million. Tony West paid a little over a million dollars to be appointed the Associate Attorney General on March 9, 2012, the very same day his money is recorded in DNC’s ledger. William Eacho received the Ambassadorship to Austria for raising a mere $950k for Obama, that’s a steal.
Basically, President Obama and the DNC sold government positions off to the highest bidder while Hillary watched as Secretary of State. Based on what we know of The Clinton Foundation, there is no reason to expect any difference in operating procedure should Hillary be elected.
Of course, CNN reported that “There appear to be no damaging emails in this batch.” At least when you buy CNN, they stay bought!
Just One Tactic Out of Many
Reframing the truth as the absurd is just one tactic out of the many employed by the liberal left, the others are still used daily as well. Another of the widely used tactics is to deflect their wrong doings with true or false wrong doings of the Bush or Regan Administrations. Being able to say, see, they did it too seems to be vindication for their crimes, even if it is all based on lies.
Just a few days ago, Nina Burleigh from Newsweek penned an article titled “THE GEORGE W. BUSH WHITE HOUSE ‘LOST’ 22 MILLION EMAILS”; you have to go through most of this damning article that makes the number of “lost” Clinton emails seem insignificant, before you find out that the emails were found and had simply been mislabeled.
A bit different than deleting emails, wiping the hard drive with Bleach Bit and then taking a hammer to all your Blackberry’s so that not even the FBI could retrieve info from them. But the truth is buried so far down in the article, that most will never see it, or will be so pissed off at everyone except Hillary that it won’t matter.
Ignoring facts is another popular tactic with the Hillary campaign, she continued to claim she never sent and classified emails even after the FBI had confirmed that she did. She simply ignores what the FBI publicly stated and still claims she never sent them.
Another great tactic all politicians use is good old fashioned lying, but Hillary has taken it to a new level by telling different lies to different groups and she manages to not have anyone call her out on it. She told the American public that she did not send classified emails while at the same time telling the FBI that she didn’t know that “C” meant classified.
She told us that her previous concussion is not a matter to discuss as it does not and has not impacted her work, but told the FBI that she could only work at the State Department for a few hours a day and could not recall every briefing she received as an excuse for not properly handling classified information.
Her campaign told us that her “fainting” at the 9/11 ceremony was from pneumonia, but she hugged and kissed people at the location and went to her daughter’s apartment to rest and spend time with her granddaughter. Who would expose all those people and their granddaughter to pneumonia?
The lies upon lies pile up so high that even the truth is now absurd!
While the mainstream media may not be making a big deal out of the leaks, or in some cases even covering it up because of their involvement, these emails and audio files have shown us just how corrupt our election process actually is.
Who Is to Blame?
As much as the Democrats are trying to spin this story and place the blame on the Russians and connect it to Donald Trump, the simple fact remains that if these abuses did not occur, there would be nothing to leak. The Russians are a strange scapegoat however since it would be illogical for the Russians to want to ruin Hillary’s presidential run after dealings with Uranium One.
Uranium One is a uranium mining company owned by the Russian government with headquarters in Toronto and it has operations in Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, South Africa and the United States. It is a Canadian corporation even though it is 100% Russian owned. Rosatom, the Russian State-owned Atomic Energy Corporation, through its subsidiary ARMZ Uranium Holding, purchased the balance of a 100% stake in the Uranium One in January 2013.
Approval of the transfer of 1/5th of all of the American uranium resources to Russian controlled Uranium One occurred during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as United States Secretary of State. As is usual with most of her dealings with foreign governments, there were a number of donations to the Clinton Foundation by the principals of Uranium One. During the same period there was a speaking engagement in Russia by former president Bill Clinton for which he was paid a lofty $500,000.
No matter how shady the above looks, only the Russians would be able to make it illegal by saying that the donations and speaking fees were indeed a payment to Hillary Clinton for approving the deal. Baring that direct connection, it only looks like the usual pay for play deals that Hillary used to make them so wealthy and while that looks bad, it isn’t illegal to only look crooked, you have to be caught as well.
No, the blame falls on the shoulders of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, the people that worked for her, the entire Democratic National Convention (DNC) and quite possibly, Hillary Roddam Clinton who many believe to be the mastermind behind all of the corruption linked to the DNC. Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down following the convention because of the scandal, but before that could even happen, Hillary announced that Debbie Wasserman Schultz would immediately be hired as Hillary’s National Campaign Chair.
How Debbie Wasserman Schultz Was Allowed to Corrupt the System
First off, you need to ask yourself, would the person who just stepped down from the DNC in disgrace for unethical dealings in the primaries be your first choice to run your campaign? Only Hillary could pull something like that off and have the media fall silent, but as the #DNCLeaks tell us, the media was in collusion with her campaign the entire time anyways.
As I have now learned to do for every article I write, I typed a few keywords into the Genesis Total Research Project (GTRP) as it doesn’t just search for the words, but shows connections and relationships that you wouldn’t see without a visual data analysis like GTRP. Something popped out at me in the screen below, and even though it is commonly available information, the relationship hasn’t been so clear as it is in that screen.
This got me thinking, we all know that Hillary Clinton has wanted to be president for some time and her loss to Barack Obama in 2008 was hard on her and her campaign co-chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
Hillary wanted to ensure she gets nominated in 2016 and what better way than have her campaign co-chair as the head of the DNC. Pretty hard to lose when your pal Debbie Wasserman Schultz is running the whole party, right?
To make this happen though, Hillary would need to convince the then current head of the DNC to not only step down from the position, but also recommend Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DWS) to lead the party. You would need to make some pretty big promises for someone to go along with that plan and step down from the DNC and recommend DWS to succeed them.
But, in 2011, the head of the DNC did exactly that, he stepped down and recommended that Debbie Wasserman Schultz succeed him as the head of the party. That person was Tim Kaine and in 2016 would be named as Hillary Roddam Clinton’s Vice President running mate.
All that sounds more like an episode of Mission Impossible than the run up to a presidential election, but then again, this election is unlike any before it. What previous election saw the DNC sending out interns and paid protestors to attack the supporters of the other party’s presumptive nominee? When was the last time that both political parties attacked candidates running under the same party?
As is usually the case with anything Hillary Clinton is accused of, there is no actual evidence, it has been lost, deleted or the people who could actually testify against her end up dead through suicide, bizarre accidents or some strange type of “natural causes”.
All the direct evidence so far in the #DNCLeaks just points at Debbie Wasserman Schultz who has served Hillary Clinton well and was immediately rewarded for such service. There is a greater chance that Chelsea Clinton would end up dead from one of the mysterious circumstances that have plagued so many others in the Clinton circle than Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
who has proven her loyalty time and again.
New evidence could surface that links Hillary to all this corruption, but for now we are just told it is all the Russians fault and that there is nothing to see here.
What Is Actually in the #DNCLeaks?
Too much to fit into a single article, but we can bullet point some of the main issues and urge you to go to WikiLeaks and find out for yourself.
From WikiLeaks: Today, Friday 22 July 2016 at 10:30am EDT, WikiLeaks releases 19,252 emails and 8,034 attachments from the top of the US Democratic National Committee — part one of our new Hillary Leaks series. The leaks come from the accounts of seven key figures in the DNC: Communications Director Luis Miranda (10770 emails), National Finance Director Jordon Kaplan (3797 emails), Finance Chief of Staff Scott Comer (3095 emails), Finance Director of Data & Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish (1472 emails), Finance Director Allen Zachary (1611 emails), Senior Advisor Andrew Wright (938 emails) and Northern California Finance Director Robert (Erik) Stowe (751 emails). The emails cover the period from January last year until 25 May this year.
As you can see, this first batch of emails was from the Finance side of the DNC and still shows the corruption and racism of the Democrats, imagine what emails from the
Communications, Operations, Office of the Chair or Voter Expansion Departments would show.
Here’s a quick list of some of the items:
DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign
DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment
Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters
DNC member killed horses for insurance money, but they still accept his donations
Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC
Bringing up Sanders religion to scare the southern voters
Politico writer sending his stories to the DNC before he sends them to his editor
DNC feeding CNN the questions they want to be asked in interviews
Creating a fake job ad for a Trump business to paint him as a sexist
Draft linking news articles about trump to use as negative press
Buzz Feed and DNC connection
Press talking points, states Hillary is their candidate, dated May 5, 2016 (Before Bernie dropped out)
DNC trying to get away with violating the Hatch Act
DNC asking if Jake Tapper can do hit pieces for them
Possible money laundering by moving money back and forth to bypass legal limits
DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in MSNBC President Phil Griffin’s office
DNC making fun of black woman’s name
DNC using “taco bowl engagement” when referring to Latino voters
And this is just from the Finance Department, no wonder they are trying to make this sound like Cold War espionage, just imagine what bombshells other departments emails could have in them!
What Does It All Mean?
There is really nothing earth shattering in these emails for most Republicans, we have known that the Democrats were corrupt, we just didn’t have proof to show their constituents, and now that we have it, they won’t believe it or simply don’t care.
The divide between the two political parties is actually so great that the Democrats don’t even care that their party was subverting the primary process (well except Bernie voters) and could be shown video of Hillary biting the heads off small children and they would still vote for her. It is incredible.
Hopefully Trump will win the White House and live up to his word to “Make America Great Again”, because if the corruption of the Hillary Clinton campaign wins the presidency, we could all be in very dire circumstances.